FW: AMZN Q4 Results

 

Amazon reported Q4 revenue above consensus forecasts, with the company exceeding the high-end of its revenue guidance for the first time since 1Q18. AWS revenue grew +34%. The big positive surprises in the quarter were an acceleration in N. American revenues (chart below) and better than feared AWS sales (estimates had been coming down). The AWS result (+34%), while a deceleration, was a relief given concerns of an even bigger deceleration from share losses to Azure. Operating income came in above consensus though margins contracted ~80bps YoY.

 

Guidance: Management guided to Q1 revenue of $69B – $73B vs. consensus of $71.6B. Guidance implies growth of +16% to +22% YoY. They guided Q1 operating income of $3B – $4.2B vs. consensus of $4.1B, but this guidance includes an ~$800m lower depreciation expense due to an increase in the estimated useful life of servers.

 

N. A. Retail sales up, but profitability down: Online (+15% in Q4) and 3rd party seller services (+31% in Q4) both accelerated from Q418. Since third party fees grew faster than online sales, either their share of gross merchandise volume (GMV) grew or their take rate did. The sustainability of their nearly 27% take rate, which is a key retail profit driver for them, continues to be a risk. This accelerated growth was driven by expensive one-day delivery (which was expanded to lower priced items) that pushed e-commerce sales up, but also drove shipping costs up (to $12.9B) +43% and, as a result, operating margins lower in North America. This is reflected in N. American segment revenues accelerating to 22% from 18% and operating margins that deteriorated 150bps in Q4 and ~100bps for the full year. So, despite the robust top line growth, N. American profit dollars were down YoY – in Q4 from $2.3B to $1.9B and for the year from $7.3B in 2018 to $7B in 2019. Given that advertising and Prime fees are included in their N. American operating profit, these high margin businesses are clearly driving all of that 4.1% margin and making up for higher losses in retail. This suggests that the unit economics in North American retail continue to be challenged as one day shipping just increased their variable costs. International is still not profitable and operating income for Q4 was essentially flat (~$600m loss) on sales up 14%.

 

 

 

 

AWS not as bad as feared, but losing share to Azure and margins down: AWS is their primary source of profitability but decelerating and losing share to Azure which grew 64% this quarter, well ahead of AWS’s 34%. AWS margins declined >300bps YoY in Q4 and ~200bps YoY for FY19. By contrast, MSFT just reported Azure margins up 500bps. Alphabet’s cloud investments also pose a growing competitive threat to AWS. Mounting pressure on the AWS business seems to be one of the biggest fears of investors.

 

 

Trends with their FCF margins continue – valuation is still very expensive:  Adj. FCF margins were 4.3% (similar to 2018) resulting in ~$12B in FCF after capital leases. This is ~1.2% TTM FCF yield. The stock continues to be very expensive. Importantly, this $12B in FCF benefits from the $6.8B they pay in non-cash compensation through SBC and the $1.4B in excess tax benefits they get from SBC on top of that. Many analysts seem to use a sum of the parts valuation that places a multiple on GMV to value their online business. The problem with this is that it may be overstating the value of a retail business that continues to be subscale (i.e. losing money) w/ now likely over $340B in gross sales (GMV) and whose unit economics appear to be going in the wrong direction.

 

 

Sarah Kanwal

Equity Analyst, Director

 

Direct: 617.226.0022

Fax: 617.523.8118

 

Crestwood Advisors

One Liberty Square, Suite 500

Boston, MA 02109

www.crestwoodadvisors.com

 

$AMZN.US

[category earnings]

[tag AMZN]

 

SHW 4Q19 Update

 

Current Price: $567        Price Target: $660

Position Size: 3.4%         TTM Performance: +45%

 

SHW missed on revenue and earnings. Miss was driven by softness in certain industrial end markets and choppiness in their international businesses. This was offset by strength in the America’s group (their chain of paint stores) and growth with their largest North American retail partners. They again had strong paint stores SSS performance of ~5%. In terms of 2020 outlook, management said they expect a similar environment with North American architectural demand remaining solid and industrial demand remaining variable by geography and end market. Last quarter they called out the same weakness.

 

Key Takeaways:

·         For full year 2020, they expect sales to increase 2% to 4%. By segment, they expect the Americas Group to be at or above the high end of that range. They expect Consumer Brands to be flat or slightly up and Performance Coatings to be up low-single-digits.

·         Guided to adj. 2020 EPS of $22.70 to $23.50 (+9.4% at the midpoint). This is below consensus of $24.33.

·         Management expects flat raw material costs for 2020, with 1H being down slightly.

·         They gave multiple data points on the strength they are seeing in US commercial and residential end markets including contractor and builder sentiment and strengthening in single and multifamily permits.

·         “We enter 2020 well positioned and focused on what we can control.”

·         For FY19 margins increased in all 3 segments. Gross margin expanded as pricing initiatives offset the raw material inflation they have experienced since 2017.

·         The Americas Group:  55% of sales, +5% in Q4

o   SSS of +5%. Prices increases will be a tailwind to 2020 SSS.

o   Opened 62 net new stores for the year.

o   Professional painting contractor customers continue to report strong demand.

·         Consumer Brands Group: 16% of sales, +1% in Q4

o   Q4 growth due to selling price increases and higher volume sales to some of the group’s retail customers.

o   Full year segment sales decreased due to lower than expected sales in Asia and Australia and the impact of the Guardsman divestiture.

o   Supply chain efficiencies, pricing initiatives, moderating raw material costs aided margins

·         Performance Coatings Group: 29% of sales, -5% in Q4

o   Softer sales outside of North America and unfavorable currency translation, partially offset by selling price increases.

o   Sales for the year were variable by geography and end market. Growth in North America and Latin America was more than offset by softness in Europe and Asia. Mid-single-digit growth in packaging and coil lines was offset by softness in other product lines, most notably industrial wood.

Valuation:

  • Expected free cash flow of ~$2.2B in 2020, trading at >4% FCF yield.
  • Given growth prospects, steady FCF margins and high ROIC the stock is undervalued. They deserve a premium multiple based on large exposure to the N. American paint contractor market and lack of exposure to the cyclical sensitive auto OEM end market.

·         Share buybacks should increase in 2020 as their leverage ratio is now below target of 3x.

 

Thesis:

  • SHW is the largest supplier of architectural coatings in the US. Sherwin-Williams has the leading market share among professional painters, who value brand, quality, and store proximity far more than their consumer (do-it-yourself) counterparts.
  • Their acquisition of Valspar creates a more diversified product portfolio, greater geographic reach, and is expected to be accretive to margins and EPS. The combined company is a premier global paint and coatings provider.
  • SHW is a high-quality materials company leveraged to the U.S. housing market. Current macro and business factors are supportive of demand:
    • High/growing U.S. home equity values. Home equity supportive of renovations.
    • Improving household formation rates off trough levels (aging millennials).
    • Baby boomers increasingly preferring to hire professionals vs. DIY.
    • Solid job gains and low mortgage rates support homeownership.
    • Residential repainting makes up two thirds of paint volume. Homeowners view repainting as a low-cost, high-return way of increasing the value of their home, especially before putting it on the market.

 

$SHW.US

[category earnings]

[tag SHW]

 

 

Sarah Kanwal

Equity Analyst, Director

 

Direct: 617.226.0022

Fax: 617.523.8118

 

Crestwood Advisors

One Liberty Square, Suite 500

Boston, MA 02109

www.crestwoodadvisors.com

 

 

FW: AAPL Q1 – Big Beat and Raise

 

AAPL reported a very strong quarter beating across segments except a minor miss on services. They raised guidance for next quarter well above the street. iPhones sales were a big positive surprise at up 7.6% YoY vs expected down ~1%. Encouragingly Greater China returned to growth, which helped with the iPhone beat. The coronavirus will have an impact on supply given Apple’s manufacturing footprint in China and will also have an impact on sales within China given some store closures. All of this is factored into their above consensus guidance.  

 

Key Takeaways:

·         Revenue was up 9% YoY.

·         iPhone 11 continues to be their best-selling iPhone.

·         Mac and iPad sales were down 3% and 11% YoY, respectively. The comparison was tough due to new launches a year ago.

·         Big beat on Wearables, Home & Accessories category – set all-time records for both Apple Watch and AirPods.. The strong wearables results were in spite of supply constraints for both the Apple Watch Series 3 and Airpods Pro.

·         Active installed base of devices has now surpassed 1.5 billion.

·         Services growth decelerated very slightly to ~17% – saw double-digit growth in all regions. The miss here will probably be a focus in the news given that the LT story on Apple rides on this category. However, they are still in the early stages of ramping their opportunity with services. Including several new services that aren’t making much of a contribution yet (Arcade, Apple News+, Apple TV+). A key advantage Apple has is its uniform operating system across devices. The smartphone market is dominated by two operating systems, Apple’s iOS and Android. Apple has mid-teens % of the global market and Android has almost all the rest. However, Android’s operating system is fragmented across multiple manufacturers which can make app development for Android more difficult than for iOS. Apple’s iOS ties in a growing ecosystem of devices including wearables and they have a wealthier installed base that is more likely to pay for Apps. I think this could become more important with 5G because taking advantage of 5G across devices requires app development. 5G’s faster speeds and lower latency will enable new Apps that let people do more with their wireless devices. For instance, Apps that take advantage of artificial intelligence, augmented reality and IoT (Internet of Things). 4G enabled things like Uber and a slew of food delivery apps and Netflix and Facebook on your phone.

·         On a run rate basis with the results of the December quarter they’ve already reached their goal of doubling their fiscal year ’16 Services revenue during 2020.

·         Tim Cook suggested the potential for them to do targeted video advertising in a way that would not infringe on privacy though he wouldn’t “speculate” as to whether they would actually take advantage of that opportunity. This probably depends on the success of Apple TV+ as a subscription service. It does suggest that if they don’t get a lot of subscribers they have an alternate video strategy.

·         China – iPhone sales were up double-digits. Services and wearables were also up double-digits, Cook says iPhone 11 is doing particularly well there. Trade-in and finance programs were also well received

·         Impact from Coronavirus – Apple does have some suppliers in the Wuhan area. There are alternatives and Apple is looking for increases from them. Factories are starting back up after the Lunar Holiday on Feb. 10 which is later than expected. All of that is factored into guidance and management pointed to that as the reason for a wider than usual top line guidance range. One of their retail stores has been closed, and some partners have closed stores or reduced operating hours. Sales within the Wuhan area are small, but retail traffic across China has been reduced. Again, Apple has accounted for this in its outlook.

·         Apple Pay, revenue and transactions more than doubled year-over-year with a run-rate exceeding 15 billion transactions a year.

·         They reiterated goal of being net cash neutral “over time.”

 

Valuation:

·         Trading at about a 1% dividend yield, and ~4.7% FCF yield.

·         They have about $99B in net cash on the balance sheet. That’s about 7% of their market cap.

·         The stock is still reasonably valued and continued buyback from management’s goal of net cash neutral will support valuation.

·         In addition to the $99B in net cash they already have, they produce >$65B in FCF annually (that’s more than all the other FAANGs combined). This suggests they could buyback over 20% of their current market cap over the next 3 years.  

 

The Thesis for Apple:

  • One of the world’s strongest consumer brands and best innovators whose product demand

has proven recession resistant.

  • Halo effect -> multiplication of revenue streams: AAPL products act as revenue drivers

throughout portfolio – iPhone, iPod, MacBooks, iPad > iTunes, Apps, Software, Accessories,

  • Strong Balance and cash flow generation.
  • Increasing returns to shareholders via dividends and buybacks.

 

$AAPL.US

[category earnings]

[tag AAPL]

 

 

Sarah Kanwal

Equity Analyst, Director

 

Direct: 617.226.0022

Fax: 617.523.8118

 

Crestwood Advisors

One Liberty Square, Suite 500

Boston, MA 02109

www.crestwoodadvisors.com

 

 

Alphabet Q4 Results

Current Price: $1,434                      Price Target: under review

Position Size: 4.9%                          TTM Performance: +25%

 

Alphabet missed estimates but improved disclosures. The stock is down today, but about even with where it opened yesterday. For the first time they broke out YouTube revenue separate from search revenue and also disclosed Cloud revenue. Despite the miss, 2019 revenue grew +20% (that’s $25B in incremental revenue for the year). Weaker hardware sales contributed to the 4Q miss, but they saw ongoing strength in YouTube and Google Cloud.

 

Key takeaways:

·         Top growth drivers were mobile search, YouTube and cloud.

·         Ad Revenue:

o   Google properties (includes search and YouTube) grew ~17% in FY19, which continues to grow faster than Network member sites at +7% – these are ads placed on sites that Google does not own.  

o   Search revenue was +15% (a deceleration from +22% in 2018) and YouTube was +36%.

o   YouTube ad revenue was revealed to be a $15B business – there seemed to be a wide range of estimates on how big this was, but this is in the range. Interestingly, their YouTube ad revenue is bigger than CBS, NBC, Fox and ABC ad revenue combined. See chart below.

o   They do not report YouTube’s profitability.

·         Google Cloud was +53% and is at a $10B run rate. GCP’s growth rate accelerated from 2018 to 2019. Commentary around this business, including backlog, was very strong. They are investing heavily behind this.

·         Google Other Revenues (includes Google Play, Hardware and YouTube’s non-advertising revenue)

o   In Q4, other revenues were up 10% YoY, primarily driven by growth in YouTube and Play, offset by declines in hardware. Lapping product launched contributed to lower growth.

o   YouTube now has over 20 million music and premium paid subscribers and over 2 million YouTube TV paid subscribers, ending 2019 at a $3 billion annual run rate in YouTube subscriptions and other non-advertising revenues. They also have a YouTube shopping initiative where people can now buy products in YouTube’s home feed and search results.

·         Other Bets: Losses grew. Management brought up the intention to get outside investors in these businesses. Verily is an example of a company in the portfolio that has outside investors like Silver Lake. They said they would consider opportunities for some of their Other Bets to take similar steps over time.

·         Key expense lines:

o   Higher cost of revenues driven by costs associated with data centers and servers, and content acquisition costs, primarily for YouTube.

o   Headcount was key driver in opex increases. They added 20k employees in 2019, an increase of over 20%! Majority of new hires were engineers and product managers. The most sizable headcount increases were again in Google Cloud for both technical and sales roles.

·         Share buybacks increased 59% QoQ.

 

Valuation:

·         Reasonably valued, trading at ~3.5-4% FCF yield on 2020.

·         $105B in net cash, ~11% of their market cap.

 

 

$G OOGL.US

[category earnings]

[tag GOOGL]

 

Sarah Kanwal

Equity Analyst, Director

 

Direct: 617.226.0022

Fax: 617.523.8118

 

Crestwood Advisors

One Liberty Square, Suite 500

Boston, MA 02109

www.crestwoodadvisors.com

 

 

FW: MSFT 2Q20 Earnings

 

Current Price: $174                          Price Target: Increasing to $195 from $170

Position size: 6.7%                          TTM Performance: 58%

 

Microsoft reported solid Q2 results, beating street high estimates on both revenue and EPS. The beat was broad based with better than expected growth in all segments. Double-digit top and bottom line growth, driven by the strength of commercial cloud. Q1 revenue was $37B (+15% YoY), gross margin dollars were up 25%, op income was up 39% and EPS was $1.51(+41%). Commercial Cloud business was up 41% constant currency and saw continued margin improvement, helping to drive op income up 39%. Counted w/in that is Azure, which was up 64% constant currency. They are taking share from Amazon’s cloud offering, AWS. This should continue as they are better positioned as more large enterprises, that are longtime customers, move to the cloud. Given their enterprise customer base, recent partnerships with SAP, VMware and Oracle, and superior Azure hybrid architecture, the company is uniquely positioned to capitalize on the growing demand for cloud services.

 

Key Takeaways:

 

·         FY 2020 revenue guidance reiterated at up double-digits and op margins guidance increased to +200bps from “increase slightly.”

·         Company Q2 gross margin was 67%, up 5 points YoY, driven by favorable sales mix and improvement across all three segments.

·         Solid growth across all 3 segments:

o   Productivity & Business Processes, up 19% YoY, $11.8B – driven by strong performance in Office commercial and LinkedIn

o   Intelligent Cloud, up 28% YoY, $11.9B – driven by continued strong growth in Azure, +64%. Suggests annualized Azure revenue of ~$17B.

o   More Personal Computing, up 3% YoY, $13.2B.

§  Ahead of expectations as better-than-expected performance across Windows businesses more than offset lower than expected search (+7%) and Surface revenue (+8%).

§  Weakness in gaming with lower console sales as we approach the next Xbox launch – revenues declined 20% constant currency.  The lower console sales benefited gross margins.

·         Q1 Commercial Cloud (consisting of O365 Commercial, Azure, Dynamics Online, and LinkedIn Commercial – this includes some revenue from the first two segments above) was $12.5B, up 41% constant currency in the quarter. Commercial cloud gross margin percentage increased 500bps, driven by material improvement in Azure gross margin.

·         Within Commercial Cloud, Azure growth accelerated to +64% constant currency, from +63% last quarter.

·         Recently  announced exclusive partnership with SAP makes Azure the preferred destination for every SAP customer. Large customers mentioned on call include Accenture, Coca Cola, Rio Tinto and Walgreens.

·         Ambitious new sustainability commitment: Microsoft will be carbon-negative by 2030. And by 2050, they say they will remove all the carbon they have emitted since the company was founded in 1975. And their $1 billion Climate Innovation Fund will accelerate the development of carbon reduction and removal technologies.

·         Returned $8.5 billion to shareholders through share repurchases and dividends.

 

Valuation:

·         Trading at a 3-4% FCF yield –still reasonable for a company with double digit top line growth, high ROIC and a high and improving FCF margins.

·         They easily cover their 1.2% dividend, which they have been consistently growing.

·         Strong balance sheet with about $134B in gross cash, and about $47B in net cash.

Investment Thesis:

·         Industry Leader: Global monopoly in software that has a fast growing and underappreciated cloud business.

·         Product cycle tailwinds: Windows 10 and transition to Cloud (subscription revenues).

·         Huge improvements in operational efficiency in recent quarters providing a significant boost to margins which should continue to amplify bottom line growth.

·         Return of Capital: High FCF generation and returning significant capital to shareholders via dividends and share repurchases.

$MSFT.US

[category earnings]

[tag MSFT]

 

Sarah Kanwal

Equity Analyst, Director

 

Direct: 617.226.0022

Fax: 617.523.8118

 

Crestwood Advisors

One Liberty Square, Suite 500

Boston, MA 02109

www.crestwoodadvisors.com

 

 

Disney 1Q20 Results

 

Key takeaways are:  

 

1. Better than expected Disney+ subscriber numbers of 26.5m subs (consensus ~20m) for Q1 and 28.6m subs as of Monday.

2. Headwinds: Coronavirus impact is manageable and temporary which negatively impacted guidance by $280m. Seeing some impact from cord-cutting which is expected and offset by DTC over time.

3. Despite this, long-term fundamentals remain strong, as Disney’s subscriber numbers demonstrate the quality of their content puts them in a solid position to win viewers that shift from cable TV bundles to streaming

 

Share price: $140              Target price: $165

Position size: 1.8%           1 yr. return: 28%

 

Disney beat expectations for revenue and earnings and reported impressive subscriber numbers on Disney+ of 26.5m subs (consensus ~20m) for Q1 and 28.6m subs as of Monday. These subscribers are mostly domestic, with big international launches coming later this year. They have already almost hit the 30m US subs that mgmt. was targeting in year 5. They are ramping this business far faster than Netflix, which took several years to hit that mark and has ~62m US subs after over a decade. Better subs and solid ARPU mean the economics of DTC are tracking ahead of expectations.

A key headwind for Disney right now is the coronavirus which negatively impacted guidance by $280m due to the closure of their Shanghai and Hong Kong parks. The full impact is not clear yet as the length of closures is uncertain, but their Int’l parks business is much smaller and lower margin than their US parks. Theater closures could also impact Studio results. The Chinese box office varies a lot by movie (most recently, 8.5% for Frozen 2). Aside from the temporary impact of the coronavirus, they saw a negative impact to ad revenue in their Media segment from more cord cutting. This highlights the fact that Disney is juggling viewers shifting from cable bundles to Disney+, Hulu and ESPN+, which can be a tailwind to one segment and a headwind to another. Despite this, long-term fundamentals remain strong, as Disney’s subscriber numbers demonstrate the quality of their content puts them in a solid position to win viewers that shift from cable TV bundles to streaming and also their ability to profit from their intellectual property in multiple ways across segments. Over time, their DTC initiative should strengthen synergies between their businesses, lead to higher margins and a higher multiple on recurring revenue.  

 

Highlights:

·         EPS of $1.53 vs $1.46 consensus, driven largely by Studio and Broadcasting.

·         Total revenue was slightly better than expected, with beats in all segments (especially Broadcasting and Studio) offset by higher than expected eliminations from licensing to DTC.

·         Direct-to Consumer (DTC) & International:

o   All DTC platforms, including ESPN and Hulu are tracking ahead of expectations. 7.6m ESPN+ subscribers (guidance of 8-10m in 2024). 30.7m Hulu paid subs (guidance of 40-60m in 2024). Of those, 3m pay for Hulu’s cable-like service, Hulu Live. Hulu is seeing strong ad revenue with their ad supported subscription level. Hulu will begin expanding internationally in 2021.

o   Disney+:

§  Original guidance was for FY 2024 subs of 60-90m globally, w/ 20-30m in the US and 40-60m international. They didn’t raise guidance, but they are basically already at the high end of this in the US after less than 3 months.

§  Q1 op income losses associated with launch of Disney+ were lower than expected. Breakeven originally guided to 2024. Given better subs and solid average revenue per user, the economics of this business is tracking better than expected.

§  Key investor concerns overcome: investors questioned how big contribution of Verizon offer for free 1 year of Disney+ with unlimited plans would be and also questioned whether churn would spike following the end of The Mandalorian season one which ended on 12/27. The contribution from Verizon free offer was lower than expected (5-6m subs). Subs have continued to increase since the end of Dec. with broad-based viewership across genres, which helps validate the appeal of their content beyond key new exclusives. So far, churn and conversions from free trials to pay have been better than expected.  

§  NFLX comparison: Disney went from 10m subs on day 1 (in November), to almost 29m now. NFLX reported 10m subs at the end of 2008. It took them until Q1 2013 to get to 29m. For sure, not an entirely fair comparison as streaming was a newer concept then and broadband speeds were slower, but still a benchmark. NFLX now has 169m subscribers (US is ~62m of that).

§  DTC geographic expansion will be a tailwind to sub growth: multiple geographies launching later this year including several European markets and India in March.

·         Parks:

o   Domestic park revenue +10% driven by pricing, higher guest spending and 2% attendance growth. Int’l parks results hurt by lower attendance in Hong Kong due to political events.

o   They guided to a coronavirus 2Q op income headwind of $280m, which assumes their Shanghai and Hong Kong parks are closed for two months. The closures came at a lucrative peak travel time with Lunar New Year.

o   Disneyland and Disney World make up the majority of revenue for this segment and at a much higher margin than their international parks.

o   If the Coronavirus spreads and were to cause a closure of their US parks this would be a far bigger impact. Domestic Parks and Experiences (which includes cruise ships) is ~$4B or ~25% of their total operating income.

·         Media:

o   They had a good quarter with better broadcasting results, but an acceleration in cord-cutting could squeeze TV ad and affiliate revenue (though likely a benefit to DTC segment). ESPN saw ad revenue decline 4.5% this quarter, which was partially offset by higher pricing. Ad revenue was ~15% of total revenue in 2019 with 2/3 of this from the Media segment and the rest from DTC. Their growing DTC segment is an offset to this segment and ESPN+ could eventually be a home for more sports content over time.

·         Studio:

o   Frozen 2 was a big contributor this quarter. They are lapping a strong movie slate from last year. This business is hit driven and thus results can be lumpy.

o   China could potentially weigh on results but impact should be small. Their next major film release is Mulan on March 27. This was expected to do well in China.  

o   China’s movie regulator typically allows only 34 foreign films to be shown in theaters each year. Attaining a slot can significantly boost a movie’s global box office. For example, China made up ~22% of Avenger Endgame’s total box office – which is larger than what’s typical and was the biggest Hollywood film ever in China. In general, super hero movies tend to do well in the Chinese market, more so than animated movies. Most recently, about 8.5% of Frozen 2’s box office was from China.  

·         Consumer Products:

o   Strong sales of Frozen and Star Wars merchandise

o   Baby Yoda from the Mandalorian has apparently “taken the world by storm.”

 

Investment Thesis:

  1. Disney is a global media and entertainment company that owns a massive library of intellectual property.
  2. Their competitive advantage is their evergreen brands and synergistic business model. Disney can create content that builds off existing franchises and can be monetized across all their business, giving them the ability to create higher budget, quality content and an ever growing library of IP.
  3. New direct-to-consumer (DTC) initiative will strengthen synergies between businesses and lead to structurally higher margins and higher multiple on recurring revenue business.
  4. Recent Fox acquisition improves their content positioning and global growth opportunities.
  5. High quality company with solid balance sheet, strong FCF generation and ROIC.

 

 

 

 

$DIS.US

[category earnings]

[tag DIS]

 

Sarah Kanwal

Equity Analyst, Director

 

Direct: 617.226.0022

Fax: 617.523.8118

 

Crestwood Advisors

One Liberty Square, Suite 500

Boston, MA 02109

www.crestwoodadvisors.com

 

 

CCI Up on potential TMUS/S merger

 

A U.S. District judge ruling today cleared the way for a T-Mobile/Sprint merger. Tower operators (CCI, SBAC, AMT) would see a headwind to leasing activity as the combined company eliminates redundant towers but this would happen over time as contracts expire –  mitigating this are concessions to the merger that could boost near-term leasing activity. Dish (which would acquire Sprint’s prepaid wireless business) and the New T-Mobile have each committed to extensive 5G build-outs as part of the DoJ’s merger-related agreements.  

 

 

Sarah Kanwal

Equity Analyst, Director

 

Direct: 617.226.0022

Fax: 617.523.8118

 

Crestwood Advisors

One Liberty Square, Suite 500

Boston, MA 02109

www.crestwoodadvisors.com

 

$CCI.US

[category equity research]

[tag CCI]

 

Disney 1Q20 Results

Key takeaways are:

1. Better than expected Disney+ subscriber numbers of 26.5m subs (consensus ~20m) for Q1 and 28.6m subs as of Monday.

2. Headwinds: Coronavirus impact is manageable and temporary which negatively impacted guidance by $280m. Seeing some impact from cord-cutting which is expected and offset by DTC over time.

3. Despite this, long-term fundamentals remain strong, as Disney’s subscriber numbers demonstrate the quality of their content puts them in a solid position to win viewers that shift from cable TV bundles to streaming

Share price: $140 Target price: $165

Position size: 1.8% 1 yr. return: 28%

Disney beat expectations for revenue and earnings and reported impressive subscriber numbers on Disney+ of 26.5m subs (consensus ~20m) for Q1 and 28.6m subs as of Monday. These subscribers are mostly domestic, with big international launches coming later this year. They have already almost hit the 30m US subs that mgmt. was targeting in year 5. They are ramping this business far faster than Netflix, which took several years to hit that mark and has ~62m US subs after over a decade. Better subs and solid ARPU mean the economics of DTC are tracking ahead of expectations.

A key headwind for Disney right now is the coronavirus which negatively impacted guidance by $280m due to the closure of their Shanghai and Hong Kong parks. The full impact is not clear yet as the length of closures is uncertain, but their Int’l parks business is much smaller and lower margin than their US parks. Theater closures could also impact Studio results. The Chinese box office varies a lot by movie (most recently, 8.5% for Frozen 2). Aside from the temporary impact of the coronavirus, they saw a negative impact to ad revenue in their Media segment from more cord cutting. This highlights the fact that Disney is juggling viewers shifting from cable bundles to Disney+, Hulu and ESPN+, which can be a tailwind to one segment and a headwind to another. Despite this, long-term fundamentals remain strong, as Disney’s subscriber numbers demonstrate the quality of their content puts them in a solid position to win viewers that shift from cable TV bundles to streaming and also their ability to profit from their intellectual property in multiple ways across segments. Over time, their DTC initiativeshould strengthen synergies between their businesses, lead to higher margins and a higher multiple on recurring revenue.

Highlights:

· EPS of $1.53 vs $1.46 consensus, driven largely by Studio and Broadcasting.

· Total revenue was slightly better than expected, with beats in all segments (especially Broadcasting and Studio) offset by higher than expected eliminations from licensing to DTC.

· Direct-to Consumer (DTC) & International:

o All DTC platforms, including ESPN and Hulu are tracking ahead of expectations. 7.6m ESPN+ subscribers (guidance of 8-10m in 2024). 30.7m Hulu paid subs (guidance of 40-60m in 2024). Of those, 3m pay for Hulu’s cable-like service, Hulu Live. Hulu is seeing strong ad revenue with their ad supported subscription level. Hulu will begin expanding internationally in 2021.

o Disney+:

§ Original guidance was for FY 2024 subs of 60-90m globally, w/ 20-30m in the US and 40-60m international. They didn’t raise guidance, but they are basically already at the high end of this in the US after less than 3 months.

§ Q1 op income losses associated with launch of Disney+ were lower than expected. Breakeven originally guided to 2024. Given better subs and solid average revenue per user, the economics of this business is tracking better than expected.

§ Key investor concerns overcome: investors questioned how big contribution of Verizon offer for free 1 year of Disney+ with unlimited plans would be and also questioned whether churn would spike following the end of The Mandalorian season one which ended on 12/27. The contribution from Verizon free offer was lower than expected (5-6m subs). Subs have continued to increase since the end of Dec. with broad-based viewership across genres, which helps validate the appeal of their content beyond key new exclusives. So far, churn and conversions from free trials to pay have been better than expected.

§ NFLX comparison: Disney went from 10m subs on day 1 (in November), to almost 29m now. NFLX reported 10m subs at the end of 2008. It took them until Q1 2013 to get to 29m. For sure, not an entirely fair comparison as streaming was a newer concept then and broadband speeds were slower, but still a benchmark. NFLX now has 169m subscribers (US is ~62m of that).

§ DTC geographic expansion will be a tailwind to sub growth: multiple geographies launching later this year including several European markets and India in March.

· Parks:

o Domestic park revenue +10% driven by pricing, higher guest spending and 2% attendance growth. Int’l parks results hurt by lower attendance in Hong Kong due to political events.

o They guided to a coronavirus 2Q op income headwind of $280m, which assumes their Shanghai and Hong Kong parks are closed for two months. The closures came at a lucrative peak travel time with Lunar New Year.

o Disneyland and Disney World make up the majority of revenue for this segment and at a much higher margin than their international parks.

o If the Coronavirus spreads and were to cause a closure of their US parks this would be a far bigger impact. Domestic Parks and Experiences (which includes cruise ships) is ~$4B or ~25% of their total operating income.

· Media:

o They had a good quarter with better broadcasting results, but an acceleration in cord-cutting could squeeze TV ad and affiliate revenue (though likely a benefit to DTC segment). ESPN saw ad revenue decline 4.5% this quarter, which was partially offset by higher pricing. Ad revenue was ~15% of total revenue in 2019 with 2/3 of this from the Media segment and the rest from DTC. Their growing DTC segment is an offset to this segment and ESPN+ could eventually be a home for more sports content over time.

· Studio:

o Frozen 2 was a big contributor this quarter. They are lapping a strong movie slate from last year. This business is hit driven and thus results can be lumpy.

o China could potentially weigh on results but impact should be small. Their next major film release is Mulan on March 27. This was expected to do well in China.

o China’s movie regulator typically allows only 34 foreign films to be shown in theaters each year. Attaining a slot can significantly boost a movie’s global box office. For example, China made up ~22% of Avenger Endgame’s total box office – which is larger than what’s typical and was the biggest Hollywood film ever in China. In general, super hero movies tend to do well in the Chinese market, more so than animated movies. Most recently, about 8.5% of Frozen 2’s box office was from China.

· Consumer Products:

o Strong sales of Frozen and Star Wars merchandise

o Baby Yoda from the Mandalorian has apparently “taken the world by storm.”

Investment Thesis:

  1. Disney is a global media and entertainment company that owns a massive library of intellectual property.
  2. Their competitive advantage is their evergreen brands and synergistic business model. Disney can create content that builds off existing franchises and can be monetized across all their business, giving them the ability to create higher budget, quality content and an ever growing library of IP.
  3. New direct-to-consumer (DTC) initiativewill strengthen synergies between businesses and lead to structurally higher margins and higher multiple on recurring revenue business.
  4. Recent Fox acquisition improves their content positioning and global growth opportunities.
  5. High quality company with solid balance sheet, strong FCF generation and ROIC.

$DIS.US

[tag DIS]

Sarah Kanwal

Equity Analyst, Director

Direct: 617.226.0022

Fax: 617.523.8118

Crestwood Advisors

One Liberty Square, Suite 500

Boston, MA 02109

www.crestwoodadvisors.com

TJX 3Q20 Earnings Update

Current Price: $60 Price Target: Raising to $65 from $60

Position Size: 3.4% TTM Performance: 22%

TJX is up on a strong earnings report and raised guidance. They beat on revenue and EPS, with SSS up 4% vs guidance of 1-2% (which they lowered last quarter). Off-price continues to outpace the rest of retail. Management’s commentary on the call around their inventory positioning and general environment for Marmaxx was very, very positive. Full year SSS and EPS guidance increased.

Key takeaways:

· Revenue beat on same store sales of +4% vs expected +2.6%.

· Traffic was again the biggest driver of SSS. E-commerce sales are not included in SSS numbers.

· Marmaxx (their largest segment) – comp sales increased 4%, lapping a very strong 9% increase last year.

· International had the strongest SSS of +6% – they continue to take share despite the uncertainty of Brexit and a tough retail environment in Europe.

· GM were better than expected but offset by higher SG&A. Higher payroll costs and escalating freight expenses from rising home-furniture penetration are margin headwinds.

· Excellent inventory availability – specifically, mgmt talked about growing e-commerce channels being a source of inventory supply as online merchants struggle to appropriately gauge their own inventory levels – almost all the goods they’re selling on websites are imported goods with long lead times. They are trying to predict sales by category and item, but don’t have all the history that a brick and mortar retailer would have. This highlights part of TJX’s competitive advantage – their scale and centralized merchandising. The efficacy of this is reflected in high inventory turns, which allows them to be very liquid and very opportunistic w/ inventory buys. They buy in season and continuously flow merchandise to stores.

· Tariffs – Q4 guidance includes small negative impact from tariffs. Thus far, they have benefited from vendors buying in merchandise earlier due to tariffs, which has resulted in more availability for TJX. But given TJX’s high turns, they buy-in inventory on a much shorter-term basis, so they don’t have visibility yet into 2020 and the potential impact from tariffs. They do not directly source a significant amount of goods from China.

· M&A – They disclosed a $225million investment in 25% of Familia, a major (275 store) off-price apparel/home retailer in Russia that could double its store base in the next 3-5 years. They are Russia’s only major off-price retailer. TJX may take a larger stake in the future.

· Chart below demonstrates TJX’s resistance to e-commerce and economic cycles. Despite the ramp in e-commerce share of retail over the last several years, of the companies listed below TJX is nearly half of aggregate incremental spend. The companies listed below represent more than 2/3 of the ~$275B in US apparel retail sales. Additionally, in the ’08 to ’09 period they were one of few retailers that continued to grow and post positive SSS.

Continue reading “TJX 3Q20 Earnings Update”

CSCO 1Q20 Update

Current Price: $44 Target Price: $63

Position size: 3.7% TTM Performance: 1%

CSCO reported good Q1 results, but guided below expectations for next quarter. Revenue growth guided to -3% to -5% vs street +2.7% and adj. EPS guided to $0.75 to $0.77 vs street $0.79. The weakness was attributed to a weakening macro environment, not company-specific issues. Last quarter they said they saw early signs of macro weakness. They said the macro environment has continued to deteriorate and was broad-based across all end markets (except public sector) and geographies. While weakening business confidence and a resultant slowdown in enterprise spending would be a headwind for them, the secular drivers that Cisco stands to benefit from are very much intact. Long-term Cisco will benefit from a product refresh cycle that is ultimately driven by increasing data traffic. With rising data traffic, technologies are changing (5G, IoT, WiFi 6) and networks are becoming more complex – Cisco’s products help companies solve for that by helping them simplify, automate, and secure their infrastructure. Capital return program should limit downside – buying back shares and now >3% dividend yield that’s easily covered (helps provide a floor, especially w/ falling rates).

Thesis intact, key takeaways:

· Deteriorating macro conditions across every region and now expanding into the Commercial (SMB’s) and Enterprise verticals. Mgmt said commercial tends to be the most resilient and they saw broad based weakening with those customers across the globe. They pointed to weakening business confidence as a result of macro uncertainty due to trade wars, Brexit, Hong Kong, uncertainty in Latin America, upcoming US elections and potential impeachment.

· In terms of macro softening management talked specifically about smaller deal sizes and approval process across industries getting longer…a leading indicator of tightening corporate budgets.

· Infrastructure Platforms (largest segment, ~58% of revs) was down -1.4% YoY. Similar to last quarter, all the businesses were up except for routing from soft Service Provider (cable and telecomm companies) demand. Switching had growth in both campus and data center with the continued ramp of the Catalyst 9000 and strength of the Nexus 9000 (both sold w/ 3-5yr software agreements). Management commented that the campus refresh cycle continues to be strong.

· Strong performance in Applications (+6% YoY) and Security (+22% YoY).

· Service revenue was up 4%, driven by software and solution support.

· Gross margins and op margins better than expected, in part benefitting from the positive impact of rising software mix.

· By end markets, Public sector order metrics remained strong (+6% YoY) while enterprise and commercial were each down 5%, and service provider was down 13%.

· By geography, Americas and EMEA were each down 3% and APJC was down 5%. Total emerging markets were down 13% with the BRICS plus Mexico down 26%. China is <3% of sales, revenue was down 31% in Q1 (was down 25% last quarter).

· Product mix continues to improve with more software/subscription. By year end, they target 50% of their revenue to be from software and services – a target which they reiterated they will hit. Subscription revenue was 71% of total software revenue, up 12pts YoY and 5 points sequentially. This transition will drive an upward trend in CSCO’s margins over the next several years.

Valuation:

· They have a >3% dividend yield which is easily covered by their FCF.

· Capital allocation strategy of returning a minimum of 50% of their FCF to shareholders annually through share repurchases and dividends. Their annual dividend is $6B.

· Forward FCF yield is ~7.5%, and is supported by an increasingly stable recurring revenue business model and rising FCF margins.

· The company trades on a hardware multiple, but the multiple should expand as they keep evolving to a software, recurring revenue model. Hardware trades on a lower multiple because it is lower margin, more cyclical and more capital intensive.

Thesis on Cisco:

· Industry leader in strong secular growth markets: video usage, virtualization and internet traffic.

· Cisco is the leader in enterprise switching and service provider routing and one of the few vendors that can offer end-to-end networking solutions.

· Significant net cash position and strong cash generation provide substantial resources for CSCO to develop and/or acquire new technology in high-growth markets and also return capital to shareholders.

· Cisco has taken significant steps to restructure the business which has helped reaccelerate growth and stabilize margins.

$CSCO.US

[tag CSCO]

Sarah Kanwal

Equity Analyst, Director

Direct: 617.226.0022

Fax: 617.523.8118

Crestwood Advisors

One Liberty Square, Suite 500

Boston, MA 02109

www.crestwoodadvisors.com

PLEASE NOTE!

We moved! Please note our new location above!