Resmed 3Q20 earnings summary

Key Takeaways:

 

·         Revenue up 17%, operating profits up 31% from mix and manufacturing/procurement efficiencies

·         Rapidly pivoted their business to produce more ventilators (life-support and non-invasive)

·         SaaS growth of 12%

·         Dividends maintained

 

 

Current price: $155                    Price target: $168

Position size: 3.77%                    1-year performance: +49%

 

Resmed reported sales and profit results above expectations, helped in part by the increased demand for ventilators. Results were good worldwide: the US/Canada/Latam saw a 12% growth, Europe/Asia/Row grew 27%, and SaaS +12%. Profits increased thanks to mix and operational efficiencies. The company highlighted in its presentation its efforts to help with the COVID-19 crisis, seeking a fair and ethical allocation of products globally, as well as transitioning its production lines to support the need for ventilators:

o   ventilators production tripled to meet demand

o   ventilation masks up 10x

 

The management team believe this crisis will accelerate the need to monitor patients remotely (a big part of RMD’s growth strategy prior to the virus pandemic). See the chart below on how they are offering digital health solutions:

 

 

Thesis on RMD:

  • Leading position in the underpenetrated sleep apnea space
  • Duopoly market
  • New product cycle
  • Returns of capital to increase: ~1% share buyback/year (back in FY18), dividend yield of 2%

 

$RMD.US

[category earnings] [category equity research] [tag RMD]

 

 

Julie S. Praline

Director, Equity Analyst

 

Direct: 617.226.0025

Fax: 617.523.8118

 

Crestwood Advisors

One Liberty Square

Suite 500

Boston, MA 02109

 

www.crestwoodadvisors.com

 

 

MSFT Q3 Results

 

Key takeaways:

·         MSFT beat across all segments. Total revenue growth accelerated to +16% on a constant currency basis vs +15% the past two quarters.

·         COVID-19 had minimal net impact on total revenues as strength in some areas offset weakness in others. Cloud strength was a key theme.

·         Guidance better than feared…high end of their guidance for Q4 was ahead of consensus. Assumes advertising spend levels from March do not improve in Q4, which will impact Search and LinkedIn.

·         Satya Nadella said, “we’ve seen two years’ worth of digital transformation in two months. From remote teamwork and learning, to sales and customer service, to critical cloud infrastructure and security”…”There is both immediate surge demand, and systemic, structural changes across all of our solution areas that will define the way we live and work going forward.”

 

Additional Highlights:

·         Cloud strength was a key theme. They saw increases in cloud usage, particularly in Microsoft 365/Teams, Azure, Windows Virtual Desktop, advanced security solutions and Power Platform. Azure sales were +61% constant currency. Gaming along with Windows OEM and Surface also benefitted from these trends, partially offset by supply chain constraints in China that began improving in March. Strength in cloud also slightly offset in the last few weeks of the quarter by a slowdown in transactional licensing especially in SMB and LinkedIn ad spending.

·         Productivity & Business Processes segment and Intelligent Cloud segment were both ahead of the high end of their guidance. And for More Personal Computing –they had removed guidance in March related to potential impact to PC supply from Covid-19, but results ended up being within guidance.

·         Productivity and Business Processes ($11.7B) +16% YoY:

o   Strength across all products especially in Office 365 Commercial (up 27%), Dynamics 365 (up 49%) and LinkedIn (up 22%).  Office 365 now has 258 million paid seats.

o   Teams product is really shining for them right now. Teams now has more than 75 million daily active users. “We saw more than 200 million meeting participants in a single day this month.”

o   Organizations are realizing they need a comprehensive solution and Teams is the only solution with meetings, calls, chat, collaboration and with the power of Office and business process workflows in a single integrated user experience with strong security.

o   Teams is being used by New York state’s largest health provider to deliver telehealth. Teams powered the virtual NFL draft.

o   20 organizations with more than 100k employees are now using Teams, including Continental AG, Ernst & Young, Pfizer and SAP. Last week, Accenture became the first organization to surpass 500k users.

o   Accelerating Teams innovation, adding new capabilities each week and now support meetings of all sizes, meetings that scale from 250 active participants to live events for up to 100,000 attendees to streaming broadcast.

o   Teams is not just about having lots and lots of video meetings. Teams is about actually getting work done where meetings and video is one part. The utility of it will only increase as some people go back to working at the office.

o   LinkedIn seeing record engagement. 690m professionals. Users watched nearly 4 million hours of content on LinkedIn Learning in March, ~50% increase month-over-month. However, significant reduction in advertising spend, which impacted LinkedIn (and search).

·         Intelligent Cloud ($12.3B) +29% YoY:

o   Server products and cloud services revenue increased 32% with Azure revenue growth of 61% driven by continued strong growth in their consumption-based business.

o   With Azure they have more data center regions than any other cloud provider. This quarter, they announced new regions in Mexico and Spain.

o   “Will continue to aggressively expand our cloud infrastructure to support not only the usage surges of today, but the growing customer demand for our unique and differentiated cloud offerings in the future.”

o   Enterprise Services revenue increased 7%.

·         More Personal Computing ($11B) +4% YoY:

o   The supply chain in China returned to more normal operations at a faster pace than we had anticipated. And we saw increased demand from work, play and learn from home scenarios, benefiting Windows OEM, Surface, Office Consumer and Gaming.

o   Windows OEM revenue was relatively unchanged year over year

o   Windows Commercial products and cloud services revenue increased 18%

o   Search advertising revenue excluding traffic acquisition costs increased 1%. In Search ex-TAC in Q4, they expect revenue to decline in the mid-20% range, similar to March.

o   Xbox content and services revenue increased 2%. 19 million active users of Xbox Live. Seeing increased monetization of in-game content and services.

o   Surface revenue increased 2%

·         Commercial Cloud ($13.3B), +40% YoY

o   Called out MasterCard, Autodesk, AARP and Coca Cola having signed 5 yr. multi-cloud agreements for Microsoft 365, Dynamics 365 and Azure.

o   Gross margin percentage increased 4 points YoY to 67% on significant improvement in Azure gross margins.

o   COVID-19 has accelerated the urgent need for every business to create no-code, low-code apps. This is small for them, but important in terms of strategic positioning and future growth. The Power Platform enables non-technical employees to analyze data and create apps/workflows without coding knowledge. For example, Power Platform was used to build a new applications in hours so that first-line workers could track PPE because there was no ERP system that did that.

Valuation:

·         FCF was $13.7 billion, up 25%. They returned $10B to shareholders in share repurchases and dividends.

·         Recurring revenue is ~60% of total, underpins most of their valuation and is resilient and poised for additional growth. Particularly Azure, Office 365 and Dynamics 365.

·         Trading at ~3.5% FCF yield on next year.

 

 

Sarah Kanwal

Equity Analyst, Director

 

Direct: 617.226.0022

Fax: 617.523.8118

 

Crestwood Advisors

One Liberty Square, Suite 500

Boston, MA 02109

www.crestwoodadvisors.com

 

 

$MSFT.US

[category earnings ]

[tag MSFT]

 

Alphabet 1Q20 Results

Key takeaways:

·         Alphabet reported better than expected results. Revenues better than feared. Search ads saw the biggest fall off in the end of March while Cloud and YouTube fared better.

·         Exiting the quarter, search was down mid-teen percent, network ads were down low-double digits, YouTube was growing high-single digits and Google cloud platform (AWS/Azure competitor) was growing “meaningfully higher” than 52%.

·         Advertising declines weren’t as bad as some were expecting despite their mix of small-to-mid sized business and exposure to heavily hit industries like retail and travel. Facebook, which reports after the close should see a similar hit.

·         No guidance, but 2Q “will be difficult” for their advertising business. They are guiding to spending cutbacks including slowing the pace of hiring. Though they increased hiring by 20% in 2019, so they could still see meaningful growth.

·         Planning capex down in 2020 primarily driven by reduction in global office facility investments.

·         CEO, Sundar Pichai, offered up some thoughts on what might be a lasting impact, “ultimately, we’ll see a long-term acceleration of movement from businesses to digital services, including increased online work, education, medicine, shopping and entertainment. These changes will be significant and lasting.”…” companies are thinking about their shift to digital in a deeper way.”

 

 

Additional Highlights:

·         Total revenues were up 15% on a constant currency basis. Currency was a 2pt headwind.

·         Search revenue ($24.5B) up 8.6%. Ended the month of March in mid-teens percentage decline YoY. Significant rise in search activity, but reduced spending by advertisers and shift in search away from commercial topics, limiting their ability to show ads. 

·         YouTube ad sales ($4B) were +33.5%, growing faster than search revenues. Ended the quarter w/ YoY growth rate up high-single-digits.

o   YouTube watch time has also significantly increased, particularly live streams. Andrea Bocelli’s live stream on Easter had 39m views.

o   YouTube brand advertising growth accelerated in the first two months of the quarter, but started to experience headwinds in the middle of March.

o   Direct response ads continued to have substantial year-on-year growth throughout the entire quarter.

·         Network ad revenues: $5.2B, +4% YoY, exited the quarter declining mid-double digits percent.

·         Google cloud (GCP and G Suite): was $2.8B, +52%.

o   Driven by significant growth at GCP and ongoing strong growth at G Suite. Growth rate at GCP was meaningfully higher than that of Cloud overall.

o   Saw headcount increases.

o   Some deals taking longer to complete.

o   100 million students and educators are using Google Classroom, doubled the number from the beginning of March.

o   Meet: schools and businesses, in particular, are using their secure video conferencing platform, Meet. Twitter and Shopify also use Meet. Now adding roughly 3 million new users each day, seen a 30-fold increase since January, now over 100 million daily meeting participants. “Stay tuned for much more.” Announcements coming up later this week.

·         Hardware saw a decline in device activations due to falling consumer demand globally. Just launched Pixel Buds 2.

·         Downloads of apps from Google Play rose 30% from February to March.

·         Massive increase in demand for Chromebook.

·         Other bets – revenue primarily generated by fiber and verily. Operating loss increased to $1.1 billion.

·         Margin contraction:

o   Operating margin contracted 400bps.

o   Driven by higher costs associated with depreciation, data centers, higher content acquisition costs for YouTube, headcount and a reserve for estimated credit deterioration as a result of COVID-19.

o   Partially offset by lower TAC as a percent of ad revenue, 22.1% vs 22.4%. Reflects a favorable revenue mix shift from network to Google properties.

·         Outlook: No specifics. Optimistic on the durability of their business for 2 major reasons:

o   2Q “will be difficult” for advertising

o   advertising spending closely correlates with the overall health of the economy

o   Cutting back on spending…slowing the pace of hiring. “Looking at levers we have to moderate spending.” Originally said 2020 headcount growth would be greater than the 20% growth in 2019.

o   Originally planning an increase in capex this year, now expect modest decrease. Largely driven by lower real estate expense.

o   Overall spend on tech infrastructure should be the same YoY. More spend on servers than on data center construction.

o   They are seeing early signs that consumers returning to commercial behavior. Since the close of the quarter, management noted that they have not seen further deterioration in YoY declines for search, while YouTube direct response has remained strong while and YouTube brand advertising continued to decline.

o   Given that many of the trends they are discussing were abrupt, and are from a few weeks of behavior they cautioned against extrapolating any of the trends.

·         Q1 FCF was $5.4B and they ended the quarter with cash of $117B. They have ~11% of their market cap in net cash. The stock is still reasonably valued, trading at a ~4.5% FCF yield on 2021. They plan to maintain pace of share repurchases.

·         In terms of recovery with ad spend…Pichai said, “recovery in ad spend will depend on a return to economic activity. There are two key aspects of our business that give us confidence about the future. First, as we saw after 2008, one of the strongest features of Search is that it can be adjusted quickly, so it’s relatively easier to turn off and then back on, and marketers see it as highly cost-effective and ROI based. Second, our business is more diversified than it was in 2008, for example, Cloud.”

 

 

 

 

Sarah Kanwal

Equity Analyst, Director

 

Direct: 617.226.0022

Fax: 617.523.8118

 

Crestwood Advisors

One Liberty Square, Suite 500

Boston, MA 02109

www.crestwoodadvisors.com

 

 

 

 

 

$GOOGL.US

[category earnings ]

[tag GOOGL]

 

Sensata 1Q2020 earnings results

Key Takeaways:

 

·         Q1 saw large end-markets decline globally, with Sensata doing better thanks to content growth

·         Q2 to be more challenging (already priced in the stock)

·         China pointing to a recovery

·         Could see people using more individual cars rather than public transportation due to COVID-19 change in habits

 

Continue reading “Sensata 1Q2020 earnings results”

Travelers (TRV) Q1 results

On 4/21, Travelers reported a solid Q1 EPS of $2.62, slightly lower than estimates due to higher than expected catastrophe losses.  Travelers took an $86m pretax charge for Covid-19 which was a $0.27 drag on EPS.  While some operations are seeing modest effect from the shutdowns, the full effect is still unknown.  Balance sheet remains strong and Travelers continues to buy shares and raised its dividend.

Continue reading “Travelers (TRV) Q1 results”

FW: REIT Insights

We wanted to give some insights into REITs and the changing landscape within this asset class – which has gone from a focus in retail REITs to specialty REITs through this downturn. We wanted to point out that while REITs have been hit YTD, the asset class is not overvalued and pays a strong dividend. Additionally, by investing in funds such as TIREX (TIAA-CREF’s REIT Fund), we are able to take advantage of this changing landscape and produce excess returns through exposure to strong performing REIT sectors.

 

 

Please see the graphs (and notes) provided below and the Excel attachment. Within the Excel sheet, the first tab displays the shift in weights within the REIT Index (using VNQ). The second tab will show the historical returns and current yields of each REIT sector.

 

 

 

Specialized REITs have been a fast growing part of the REIT index and include the two top performing REIT sectors: Datacenters and Towers.

 

 

AFFO: Adjusted Funds From Operations – measure of financial performance of REITs

 

 

 

Pepsi 1Q20 earnings summary

Key takeaways:

 

·         Sales growth higher than expected in Q1 due to pantry loading – Q2 sales to be slightly negative

·         Acquisition of Rockstar Energy Beverages closed, and entered exclusive distribution agreement of Bang Energy drinks – progressing on its efforts to capitalize on the rising demand for functional/energy drinks (high growth/high margins category)

·         2020 guidance withdrawn given COVID-19 uncertainties

·         Dividends and share repurchases remain

 

 

Current price: $136                          Price target: $153  

Position size: 2.48%                         1-year performance: +6%

 

Pepsi released their 1Q2020 earnings results this morning: +7.9% organic sales was above consensus of 3% (thanks to pantry loading) and EPS of $1.07 was roughly in line with consensus of $1.03. Profits were slightly better as well. Guidance for the year was withdrawn due to the virus impact being hard to measure. However the management team is expecting a low single digits decline in sales in 2Q: slower EM channels and weakness in immediate consumption channels (convenience stores/bars). The management team continues to expect large-format/e-commerce channels to benefit from recent trends, with a gradual improvement in convenience stores as people return to work. Regarding costs, labor, logistics and service costs are higher to meet consumer needs. To reduce the impact of these costs, the company is reducing discretionary and non-essential marketing expenses. As for liquidity, PEP has ample flexibility and plans to return cash to shareholder through dividends and continue share repurchases. Regarding its energy drinks strategy, PEP plans to accelerate Rockstar’s market share gains, improve Bang’s distribution and unlock potential at Mountain Dew that was previously limited by the Rockstar agreement.

 

Segment details:

 

 

 

Thesis on Pepsi:

  • Global growth opportunity with about 40% of profits coming from outside the US. CSD is only 25% of sales (and Pepsi brand only 12%)
  • Strong market share in high growth emerging markets where there is low penetration and rising per capita consumption
  • Resilient snack business provides pricing power and visibility to future cash flows (more than half of sales are from snacks not beverages). CSD is only 25% of sales (and Pepsi brand only 12%)
  • Several Great brands driving global growth: Frito Lay, Quaker, Gatorade
  • Strong balance sheet and cash flows support a solid dividend yield and share buyback program

 

 

Tag: PEP

category: earnings

$PEP.US

 

Julie S. Praline

Director, Equity Analyst

 

Direct: 617.226.0025

Fax: 617.523.8118

 

Crestwood Advisors

One Liberty Square

Suite 500

Boston, MA 02109

 

www.crestwoodadvisors.com

 

 

Schwab (SCHW) Q1 results

Last week, Schwab hosted their Spring Update to discuss reported Q4 earnings of $.62.  Despite interest rate headwinds, asset growth was solid with healthy core asset growth of $73b (+7%).  Deposits grew sharply +$58.7b up 21% as investors sold stocks and increased cash.  Deposit levels grew mostly towards the end of the quarter and will support earnings moving forward.  Valuation remains attractive.

Continue reading “Schwab (SCHW) Q1 results”

Update on Apple…

Sending an update on Apple regarding headlines today that they are planning to start selling Mac computers with Apple’s own main processors by next year. The chips likely would be in one laptop model, then extend beyond that. This would mean transitioning away from their current supplier Intel (Apple is ~9% of Intel’s sales). Taiwan Semiconductor (TSMC), Apple’s partner for iPhone and iPad processors, would build the new Mac chips. The potential for Apple to do this has been rumored/expected for a while. This isn’t about saving money (though it would), it’s about differentiating themselves and enhancing their competitive advantage…and is very much aligned with what Tim Cook said over a decade ago when he was COO, we believe that we need to own and control the primary technologies behind the products that we make.” Part of what differentiates Apple is they design their own silicon for the processor chips that are the brains of their iPhones and iPads (…and now potentially for their Macs), which gives them better control over performance and feature integration in their devices. The cutting edge for them right now is their A13 bionic which TSMC (one of the few major semiconductor foundries) makes for them and is custom built on top of licensed ARM architecture (which underpins most mobile devices). Notably, this would further push ARM (owned by Softbank) architectures beyond mobile (where it dominates), to laptop/desktop (where Intel’s x86 architecture dominates) and some suggest could ultimately pose a threat to Intel’s data center business (e.g. chips in servers). For Apple, the advantage in doing this is that their silicon is unique to them and tailored for their operating system, iOS. This has proven to give them an advantage with the way they design their phones and an advantage with developers. Android and iOS basically have a duopoly in mobile operating systems…generally any smartphone that’s not an iPhone is running an Android operating system, which Alphabet gives away. That gives Apple about 15% operating system market share and Android about 85%, however that is split up across devices/brands. The fact that Alphabet’s mobile operating system is so fragmented (and that users are often not using the same/latest version) makes app development more complex, costly and time consuming. Moreover, Apple, which dominates the high-end smartphone market, has a wealthier installed base for developers to target. The app store is fueled by third-party app developers. Easier to develop apps and a target rich audience leads to a greater number of higher quality iOS apps created by these developers for iPhone owners to download, with a better user experience. This is great for Apple b/c they make a % of revenue from Apps sold through their App store. This latest potential development should build on this advantage. They would have Macs, iPhones and iPads running the same underlying technology which should make it easier for Apple to unify its apps ecosystem, including allowing iPhone and iPad apps to run on Macs. This advantage gets more and more important as computing power in phones increases, 5G delivers better connectivity and, as a result, we have the ability to use mobile phones in enhanced ways….like apps that take advantage of augmented reality and IoT related technologies. 4G enabled advances like Uber. 5G is a step function change from this. Along this same theme, last year Apple acquired Intel’s cellular modem business for ~$1B. These are the chips that connect smartphones to the internet. They had been using QCOM for these chips, then they shifted to Intel as AAPL/QCOM were embroiled in a lawsuit. That has been settled and now Apple is again using Qualcomm’s chips. But the long-term goal here is for Apple to make these chips themselves, furthering their goal of controlling the primary technologies behind their products…and moving away from suppliers like Intel and Qualcomm. All of this is aimed at cementing Apple’s technology and ecosystem advantage which is Apple’s moat and drives their massive installed base. This can be seen by the fact that despite only having about 15% of the global smartphone market, Apple earns almost all of the industry profits b/c they have a differentiated, proprietary product/ecosystem, while Android based OEMs don’t own the silicon and software.

 

 

Sarah Kanwal

Equity Analyst, Director

 

Direct: 617.226.0022

Fax: 617.523.8118

 

Crestwood Advisors

One Liberty Square, Suite 500

Boston, MA 02109

www.crestwoodadvisors.com

 

 

$AAPL.US

[tag AAPL]

[category equity research]

 

Updated thoughts on Disney

Some updated thoughts on Disney which continues to be one of the hardest hit stocks in Focus Equity…

 

·         Parks are shut down globally, they are seeing broad theater closures and professional sports in the US are halted. The impact of the virus should be temporary and not affect Disney’s long-term competitive positioning or brands. Overall, I think the price drop in Disney’s stock reflects mostly the impact to their Parks business, which is temporarily shut down. In terms of their other businesses (which I detail further below), ESPN is getting hit, but revenue is dominated by long-term affiliate fee contracts. Their Studio business can pivot by delaying releases or sending films straight to DTC to help mitigate the impact. And DTC is seeing a ramp in subscribers. 

·         Parks – Disneyland and Disney World will be closed indefinitely (mgmt.. previously said through 3/31). Parks/hotels/cruises may take longer to return to normal activity than other businesses. While China is returning to normal, Disney Shanghai only has some restaurants and shops open and Disney Hong Kong remains closed. They’ve furloughed a large portion of employees (labor is 40-50% of park expenses). Bob Iger recently talked about re-opening relying on the advancement of testing and contact tracing as that would be needed for consumers to feel comfortable returning to the parks.

·         Media – This is their cable and broadcasting businesses. Profits in this segment are dominated by ESPN.

o    ESPN is being impacted by a halted NBA and delayed MLB & MLS. Segment revenue is comprised of affiliate fees and advertising revenue. Affiliate fees are bigger than ad revenues and the NBA is far more significant than the other sports.

o    The good news is that Disney makes most of its ESPN revenue from affiliate fees which are based on long-term contracts. Estimates are that they make $8-9/sub/month or ~$100/sub/year. They’ve been losing subs, but offsetting this with increasing prices (they can b/c live TV is increasingly important to the cable bundle). Subs are ~83m. So, a bit over $8B in affiliate revenue from ESPN. That’s over 10% of total company revenue.

o    So right now, the biggest impact for Disney ESPN revenue is w/ a loss in NBA ad revenue. Estimates seem to range from a $400-$700m loss in ad revenue for Disney, with the NBA typically bringing in $900m-$1B in ad revenue annually for Disney. This makes sense given the NBA generates $600-$700m in ad revenue during the regular season and $800m-$950m during the playoffs. This is split between EPSN and Turner and the season was heading towards playoffs. All of that is assuming the NBA doesn’t re-start the season and play into the summer as they are hoping.

o    In terms of costs, the entire NBA contract is $1.4B a year, which Disney may not have to pay all of…fees are weighted towards playoffs.

o    So, the Media segment will be hit by a loss in sports ad revenues, with likely some offset in sports rights fees. Additionally, other cable and broadcasting will see an impact to their advertising revenue. In general, TV advertising is more contract oriented and cannot be toggled down as quickly as digital advertising. 

·         Studio – results will be weighed down by film production delays and theater closures. This segment is always volatile and they are lapping a strong 2019 film slate, so it was already expected to be down. Films can be released directly to DTC which should aid subscriber numbers. Halted production lowers spending.

·         DTC & Int’l – Pre-announced better than expected subs of 50m. Consensus had been for 30m at the end of FQ2 and 40m subs by the end of F20. Recently launched in parts of Europe and India. Management’s original expectations were for 60m to 90m subs by F24. 2024 was also the targeted breakeven year. Clearly, they’re tracking ahead of that – breakeven likely to be 2022.

·         Valuation & balance sheet:

o    To put this in perspective, the stock is down nearly ~30% since the virus outbreak. As discussed above, I think the decline is mostly about their Parks & Experiences business which accounts for 31% of revenue.

o    They recently raised $6B in new debt, bringing their cash balance to close to $13B. And they arranged an additional $5B credit facility. They are 2.6x levered as a result of the Fox acquisition. They were hoping to get under 2x this year, but that will be pushed out. They have enough liquidity to cover near term maturities.

o    They pay almost $3B annually in dividends (~1.7% yield)…this could be temporarily halted to conserve cash as other companies have done.

o    Disney reports results on May 5.

 

 

Sarah Kanwal

Equity Analyst, Director

 

Direct: 617.226.0022

Fax: 617.523.8118

 

Crestwood Advisors

One Liberty Square, Suite 500

Boston, MA 02109

www.crestwoodadvisors.com

 

 

 

$DIS.US

[category equity research]

[tag DIS]