Is Gold Worth The Allocation?

As virus concerns create fears of a weakening dollar, investors flock to Gold, which has historically given a source of safety and positive returns during market volatility and drops. Yet, even with this recent spur in the value of Gold, we do not see Gold as a necessary investment in our portfolio due to:
1) Similar volatility to the S&P 500, yet lagging relative returns over the long-term;

2) No earnings growth;

3) Allocating to bonds provide better portfolio diversification, risk reduction, and a steady source of income;

4) No valuation method;

5) Low correlation between Gold and inflation over long run.

 

Case For Gold

                Gold has been an asset class that investors look towards as equity returns weaken and fears of a weakening dollar grow. Due to its close-to-zero correlation with other investment vehicles (equities, bonds, etc…) and historically strong returns during a bear market, Gold has been a way for investors to diversify their portfolio while achieving better than market returns during tough times. If bought and sold on the right dates Gold can even be a better performer than the S&P 500! Lastly, it is worth mentioning that monetary debasement fears have helped boost Gold’s growth, especially in recent times.

 

Case Against Gold

                While Gold provides diversification and strong returns during market uncertainty, and has seen an increase in value recently, we do not believe Gold is an asset class worth allocating to in our portfolio.

 

 

1) Similar volatility to the S&P 500, yet lagging returns over the long-term

2) No earnings growth

 

                A concern with allocating to Gold is its lack of financial data. Gold does not have any revenue or earnings to track and project, leaving no way of forecasting the type of growth Gold may have, and ultimately valuing the asset type. On the other hand, equities (stock in particular) do provide this type of analysis allowing us to build different modelling styles to further understand the asset class.

 

                When we look the daily 10-year volatility of Gold (Gold Spot price) against the S&P 500, we see how similar the numbers are (and how much more volatile Gold is compared to the Agg).

 

Daily 10 Year Volatility – Annualized

S&P 500

17.52%

Gold

15.57%

Agg

3.42%

 

                And even though Gold has some periods of outperformance, over the long-term Gold drastically underperforms the S&P 500 (especially when accounting for inflation).

 

YTD Return

3 Year Return

5 Year Return

10 Year Return

25 Year Return

S&P 500

1.27%

53.72%

75.92%

260.82%

1051.53%

Gold

28.81%

68.58%

64.95%

78.14%

410.20%

Gold (w/ inflation)

17.94%

45.02%

38.12%

37.19%

171.36%

Agg

7.33%

20.86%

24.71%

55.03%

316.22%

 

 

3) Allocating to bonds provide better portfolio diversification, risk reduction, and a steady source of income

 

                If minimizing risk is the concern of a portfolio, bonds provide better diversification to equities compared to Gold. In addition to this, fixed income provides a steady source of income, even when yields are on the rise and are underperforming equities.

 

Monthly 25 Year Correlation

 

Weekly 3 Year Correlation

 

 

4) No valuation method

 

               Gold does not pay a dividend, has no free cash flow, and has no true comparable assets, which makes the asset difficult to intrinsically value. The price and growth is highly dependent on the laws of supply and demand. For the value of Gold to grow, the “next” person needs to be willing to pay more for it than the “previous” person. This lack of fundamental analysis provides little direction as to when and for how long Gold should be allocated to.

 

5) Low correlation between Gold and inflation over long run

 

The debasement of the dollar has seemed to be a reason for large inflows to Gold in recent times, yet when we look at the correlation between inflation (ie. weakening dollar, increasing CPI) and Gold over a longer time horizon, we find close to no relationship (correlation value of 3.9% over a 20 year period). With such a low correlation, we would turn our attention to different investments that more directly protect against inflation (ie. TIPS).

 

 

Micah Weinstein

Research Analyst

 

Direct: 617.226.0032

Fax: 617.523.8118

 

Crestwood Advisors

One Liberty Square

Suite 500

Boston, MA 02109

www.crestwoodadvisors.com

 

FW: REIT Insights

We wanted to give some insights into REITs and the changing landscape within this asset class – which has gone from a focus in retail REITs to specialty REITs through this downturn. We wanted to point out that while REITs have been hit YTD, the asset class is not overvalued and pays a strong dividend. Additionally, by investing in funds such as TIREX (TIAA-CREF’s REIT Fund), we are able to take advantage of this changing landscape and produce excess returns through exposure to strong performing REIT sectors.

 

 

Please see the graphs (and notes) provided below and the Excel attachment. Within the Excel sheet, the first tab displays the shift in weights within the REIT Index (using VNQ). The second tab will show the historical returns and current yields of each REIT sector.

 

 

 

Specialized REITs have been a fast growing part of the REIT index and include the two top performing REIT sectors: Datacenters and Towers.

 

 

AFFO: Adjusted Funds From Operations – measure of financial performance of REITs

 

 

 

First Trust Advisors – Fed Action

Fed Fires Bazooka at Coronavirus

 

Back in July 2008, then-Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson said he wanted a “bazooka” to deal with financial threats to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.  Paulson wanted Congress to give him an unlimited credit line for these enterprises.  This time around, it’s the Federal Reserve firing a bazooka at the Coronavirus, with more possibly to come. 

 

Continue reading “First Trust Advisors – Fed Action”

AFVZX – Q4 2019 Commentary

AFVZX Commentary – Q4 2019

Thesis

AFVZX is our only active manager in the large cap U.S. equity markets and applies a quality and value tilt to their investment strategy, holding roughly 50 companies. By utilizing DCF models, bottom-up fundamentals, and holding sector weights that are equivalent to their benchmark (S&P 500 Index), the fund generates alpha over time purely through stock selection. We continue to hold AFVZX because of the team’s ability to compare stocks across all sectors which enables them to generate strong returns over the long run.

 

Continue reading “AFVZX – Q4 2019 Commentary”

TIREX – Q4 2019 Commentary

TIREX Commentary – Q4 2019

Thesis

TIREX utilizes fundamental research to find properties in high barrier markets, with higher occupancy and rent growth. By focusing on quality companies and avoiding unnecessary risks, the fund obtains a strong track record that has outperformed the benchmark and REIT ETF over time. We continue to hold TIREX because of the team’s growth focus with asset concentrations in supply constrained markets. Lastly, TIREX was the lowest cost active manager screened, at 51bps.

 

Continue reading “TIREX – Q4 2019 Commentary”

HLMEX – Q4 2019 Commentary

HLMEX Commentary – Q4 2019

Thesis

HLMEX utilizes fundamental research to find companies with strong quality and growth metrics that can be compared across the global landscape. By focusing on investments with competitive advantages, long-term growth potential, quality management, and corporate strength, HLMEX offers diversity to our EM allocation while generating alpha over the long run. We continue to hold the fund because of the team’s conviction in high quality companies and managed risk through diversification and evaluation.

 

Continue reading “HLMEX – Q4 2019 Commentary”

BEXIX – Q4 2019 Commentary

BEXIX Commentary – Q4 2019

Thesis

BEXIX is driven through bottom-up fundamental research that provides diversification within our full EM allocation. The fund looks for growth companies across all market caps that have a sustainable competitive advantage. We like BEXIX because the team takes advantage of companies that focus on consumer business and technological advancements, helping the fund produce returns above the benchmark (MSCI Emerging Markets Index).

 

Continue reading “BEXIX – Q4 2019 Commentary”

LISIX – Q4 2019 Commentary

LISIX Commentary – Q4 2019

Thesis

LISIX is a bottom-up, growth-based fund that completes the core satellite strategy within global equity. The fund is unique in that it focuses on individual stocks rather than markets and looks for reasonably priced companies with strong growth potential. We like LISIX because of the managers’ expertise in various market caps, geographies, and sectors which helps keep the fund diversified while providing strong upside and downside capture over time.

 

Continue reading “LISIX – Q4 2019 Commentary”

HILIX – Q4 2019 Commentary

HILIX Commentary – Q4 2019

Thesis

Serving as a satellite holding, HILIX is a value style fund that takes advantage names that have underperformed recently and are cheaply priced. The team generates alpha by finding companies with strong fundamentals that are overlooked during times of low consensus expectations. We like that HILIX takes advantage of extremes and gains exposure to less efficient market caps by having more holdings and moderate active bets.

 

Continue reading “HILIX – Q4 2019 Commentary”