selling Exxon

Good morning,

After review, we decided to sell Exxon out of the Focused Equity portfolio (and putting the proceeds in IVV for now). We believe the investment thesis is broken. Please look at the presentation for additional details.

Initial investment thesis is broken:

Quality of returns put at risk by capital allocation decisions

No longer the industry leader

Defensive characteristics now uncertain

More broadly we see the traditional oil industry more at risks now vs. prior cycles due to a changing landscape:

Increase of electric vehicle penetration

Renewable energy becoming a better competitor to natural gas

States mandating a % of energy coming from renewable sources

[tag XOM]

Julie S. Praline

Director, Equity Analyst

Direct: 617.226.0025

Fax: 617.523.8118

Crestwood Advisors

One Liberty Square

Suite 500

Boston, MA 02109

www.crestwoodadvisors.com

XOM sell thesis FINAL.pptx

CVS Analyst Day Summary

CVS held its Analyst Day yesterday. Overall the event was a mostly positive, as the management team provided greater details on their Aetna integration and long-term strategic vision. The main points of the day are highlighted below:

· Retail/HealthHub concept:

During the presentation, CVS focused on their HealthHub initiative. After testing 3 pilot stores in Texas, CVS concluded the concept is viable and will enter 4 new markets by the end of 2019, and ultimately open 1,500 Hubs by the end of 2021. The rapid expansion of the Hubs within its retail stores will allow CVS to incorporate this offering with the benefits design for healthcare plans nationally. Areas of opportunities are chronic care management, home hemodialysis, and analytics. These initiatives should drive $850M in operating income by 2022, and $2.5B longer term.

· PBM:

This part of the business continues to see some pressure, with net new business for FY20 currently at -$8.7bn. While it is not surprising to see some downward pressure following the merger with Aetna, we hope CVS’s guidance for a return to growth longer term will materialize sooner rather than later. There are a number of overhangs in this business that will continue to weigh on sentiment including the pending rebate rule. This should be partially mitigated by continued growth in specialty pharmacy and its new guaranteed rebate net cost model.

· Healthcare Benefits:

There is an opportunity to cross-sell SilverScript’s PDP members onto Aetna Medicare platform. On the Commercial side, management sees a low-single-digit revenue growth and high-single-digit operating profit growth in the near term, as the business remains competitive.

· Guidance:

The 2020 preliminary guidance is in line with expectations:

organic growth in the Health Care Benefits and Retail/LTC segments is partially offset by continued pressure in Pharmacy Services

at least $7.00 in 2020 EPS, representing a 2%+ growth vs 2019 estimated numbers, and EPS will be helped by debt pay down of $7.5bn through the end of 2019

CVS’s 2020-22 EPS growth targets relies on three cost-savings-oriented initiatives that are expected to drive $3.5 billion in earnings improvement by 2022:

1. Enterprise Modernization of $1.5-2.0 billion;

2. Aetna integration synergies of $900 million (vs. $750M previously announced); with $300-350 million in 2019, $800 million in 2020, and $900 million in 2021 and beyond

3. Transformation initiatives of $850 million.

· The enterprise modernization initiative and integration synergies:

CVS has set initiatives to reduce costs and improve productivity, which is expected to generate run-rate savings of $1.5-2.0 billion in 2022, which is separate is from the $900 million of integration synergies.

· Capital Allocation:

Management again pointed to a priority of using cash to pay down debt.

Management expects to generate $10-12 billion of cash to enhance shareholder value in the long term. Once leverage returns to the leverage target, capital allocation will shift to dividend growth, M&A and share repurchase.

[tag CVS]

Julie S. Praline

Director, Equity Analyst

Direct: 617.226.0025

Fax: 617.523.8118

Crestwood Advisors

One Liberty Square

Suite 500

Boston, MA 02109

www.crestwoodadvisors.com

Mexico tariffs impacts on stocks

Last night Trump tweeted that on June 10th the US will impose a 5% tariff on all goods coming into the US from Mexico until the border crisis stops.

Tariffs are scheduled as follow until Mexico acts on the border crisis:

· tariffs will rise from 5% to 10% on July 1st

· 15% on August 1st

· 25% on October 1st where they will remain permanently “until Mexico substantially stops the illegal inflow of aliens coming through its territory

The biggest impact will be felt by STZ that produces its beer in Mexico. 73% of revenue comes from Mexican imports. On the other hand, 40% of COGS are denominated in Pesos, and a likely depreciation of the currency could actually offset some of the tariffs impact on STZ’s EPS. JP Morgan’s analyst sees a high-single-digit/low-double-digit negative impact on STZ’s EPS for the year.

STZ is trading down 5% on last night’s news.

Other names impacted are:

Union Pacific (UNP)- $2B+ of revenue to and from Mexico. Stock down 3% pre-market

Colgate: 10% sales from Mexico. No move pre-market

Pepsi: ~6% sales from Mexico. No move pre-market

[tag UNP] [tag STZ] [tag CL] [tag PEP]

Julie S. Praline

Director, Equity Analyst

Direct: 617.226.0025

Fax: 617.523.8118

Crestwood Advisors

One Liberty Square

Suite 500

Boston, MA 02109

www.crestwoodadvisors.com

JNJ opioids litigations impacting the stock today

It is hard to predict what will happen in the coming years for JNJ regarding the opioids lawsuits… but below are some information that hopefully will help understand the situation:

JNJ had a 10% market share in the branded opioid market, with a settlement liability estimated between $500M and $5B (per Bloomberg). This analysis is based on prior tobacco settlements and costs. Recently competitor Teva (5% market share) settled in Oklahoma for $85M (Bloomberg sees a $250M-$2.5B settlement risk nationwide for Teva). Based on JNJ financials, the settlement amount would not cause bankruptcies risks (only minor impact on EPS based on Bloomberg’s dollar settlement assumptions), but it is hard to assess reputation risks for JNJ going forward.

The company have this information on their website:

https://www.jnj.com/addressing-flawed-reporting-on-opiod-supply

"Addressing Flawed Reporting on Opioid Supply You may have seen media coverage on ongoing litigation related to opioid-based prescription pain medicines. Plaintiffs’ attorneys are distorting the facts on the way heavily regulated raw materials and Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients (APIs) were supplied by former subsidiaries of Johnson & Johnson for use in other manufacturers’ opioid-based pain medications.

We want to be clear – these allegations are false. The facts are:

1. At every step of the process, we adhered to all laws and regulations on the manufacturing, sale, and distribution of APIs and the raw materials used in their manufacture, and we produced APIs and raw materials in accordance with quotas established by the U.S. Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA).

Johnson & Johnson previously owned two subsidiaries, Noramco and Tasmanian Alkaloids, involved in the production of controlled raw materials and APIs used to manufacture prescription pain medications. This manufacturing process is strictly regulated, limited and monitored by the DEA and global authorities. They enforce regulations and set distribution quotas based on their assessment of the need for medicines containing these substances, and our businesses always complied with these rules.

Critically, as a supplier, we did not have any role in the manufacturing, sales, or marketing of the finished products of other manufacturers.

2. We no longer own these subsidiaries, and we do not promote any opioid pain medications in the U.S.

Johnson & Johnson divested Noramco and Tasmanian Alkaloids in July 2016 to focus our attention on other areas of significant unmet medical need.

While we continue to work with stakeholders to support the safe and appropriate use of prescription pain medications, we do not actively promote these medications in the U.S.

3. Although we do not promote prescription medicines containing opioids in the U.S., we believe they play an important role in appropriate pain treatment for some patients, many of whom have no viable alternatives.

Opioid pain medicines give patients and physicians valuable options to help manage the debilitating effects of serious pain. We support the tight control of these medications and their related ingredients. Opioid abuse is a serious problem, and there is consensus among the global healthcare community that we must strike the right balance between offering legitimate pain relief and preventing abuse.

Our priority is to always provide accurate information on our medicines to physicians, so they can make the best and safest choices in partnership with their patients. We acted responsibly in the marketing and promotion of our products and will continue to defend Johnson & Johnson against baseless and unsubstantiated allegations.

Although these issues remain incredibly complex and challenging, we’re committed to being part of the conversation and part of the solution."

[tag JNJ]

Julie S. Praline

Director, Equity Analyst

Direct: 617.226.0025

Fax: 617.523.8118

Crestwood Advisors

One Liberty Square

Suite 500

Boston, MA 02109

www.crestwoodadvisors.com

Medtronic 4Q19 earnings summary

Key Takeaways:

Current Price: $91 Price Target: $100

Position Size: 2.88% TTM Performance: +4%

Medtronic released their 4Q FY19 results this morning, with organic revenue growth of 3.6%, a +140bps adjusted operating margin expansion and +8.5% adjusted EPS growth. Spine sales combined with its recently acquired Mazor spinal robot grew the most in 2 years (+5.6%), a favorable sign for its upcoming general surgery robot that will be revealed in the fall. Sales were negatively impacted in the quarter by an unexpected sterilization plant closure (should be back up and running in 1Q) and lower sales in heart devices. But overall FY19 results were solid, with organic growth of 5.5%, 50bps margin improvement and a free cash flow conversion of 83%. Continue reading “Medtronic 4Q19 earnings summary”

EOG 1Q19 earnings summary

Key Takeaways:

Current Price: $91 Price Target: $115 (NEW)

Position Size: 1.8% 1-year Performance: -23%

EOG released 1Q19 earnings with production levels ~1% above the top end of its forecast, giving some reassurance that they are well on track to deliver on current estimates for 2019. EOG mentioned on the call having 13 years of premium well inventory. Oil production was 20% higher than 1Q18. Increased efficiencies are driving better results at a lower cost, boosting earnings results. Adjusted EPS was 15% above guidance. Capex will be $6.3B for the year and will boost production by 12-16% in 2019 (as previously guided). EOG will use its FCF to strengthen its balance sheet, planning to repay $500m in debt, and $3B total between 2018 and 2021. The company is also boosting its dividend by 31%, a sign that the management team thinks cash flow will remain consistent going forward. Continue reading “EOG 1Q19 earnings summary”

CVS 1Q19 earnings summary

Key Takeaways:

Current Price: $57 Price Target: $90

Position Size: 1.60% 1-year Performance: -20%

This morning CVS published its 1Q19 earnings results and gave an update on its 2019 outlook. Both surprised to the upside, in addition to a new cost cutting program named “Enterprise Modernization Initiative”. The new cost cutting plan will look for productivity improvements across the operations (mostly rationalization of IT) and is expected to generate $1.5-$2B in savings by 2022, on top of synergies with Aetna. CVS raised its FY19 EPS guidance range to $6.75 to $6.90 from $6.68 to $6.88. The company did not want to comment on the 2020 outlook only noting that FY20 PBM selling season was expected to have a mid-90%’s retention rate. Overall we are pleased to see some relief on this story, and maintain our positive view on the name long-term. Continue reading “CVS 1Q19 earnings summary”

Sensata (ST) 1Q19 earnings summary

Key Takeaways:

Current Price: $49.7 Price Target: $61

Position Size: 2.01% 1-year Performance: -0.2%

Sensata released its 1Q19 results this morning, in line with Street expectations but better than ours, as companies we monitor had recently been incrementally more negative on the global auto market. Organic growth was ~1%: HVOR outgrew the market growth by 850bps, as did their auto business outperforming by 490bps, thanks to continued strong content growth. Margin pressure should abate as new products grow in volume. They lowered their guidance for the year based on weaker end markets in auto in China and Europe, which is not surprising. The company is continuously looking to streamline its operations to drive higher productivity and react better to lower volumes. Buybacks reduced share count by an impressive 8.3% (a 4 cent boosts to the $0.85 adjusted EPS this quarter). Overall we see the secular growth drivers intact for Sensata, while recent weakness in auto continues to pressure end markets in the near term. Continue reading “Sensata (ST) 1Q19 earnings summary”

Selling MMM, Adding to SHW #researchtrades

We are recommending the following changed to our Focused Equity portfolio:

Selling MMM, putting proceeds to bring SHW to 3% weight, and remaining proceed to IVV.

Sell MMM thesis:

We reviewed the original buy thesis following last week’s earnings release.

1. The original thesis is broken:

a. “diversified industrial revenue stream”: resilient segments did not offset larger decline in more cyclical segments

b. “margin expansion from scale and international expansion”: most segments saw a margin contraction as a result of delayed reaction by the company to end markets softness

c. “ROIC strength”: decline forecasted

d. “good capital allocator”: debt has funded a lot of the EPS growth, while cash flow from operations set to decline

2. Even after a big pull-back the stock is not cheap (both on P/E and DCF)

3. At this stage of the cycle, being patient with this name is risky (we see more slow down possible in revenue + restructuring story might not be enough)

Buying to SHW 3%:

  1. They can take price to offset raw material inflation. Not owning SHW when oil price was going up would have been a mistake.
  2. Tailwinds in key housing end market. Factors driving residential paint market:

a) Housing turnover should improve as mortgage rates are back below average rate of outstanding mortgages. This reduces the mortgage rate lock-in effect that weighed on the housing market last year.

b) Aging housing stock – by 2020 54% of the housing stock will be >40 years old.

c) Aging in place – Baby boomers, over the last couple years, have accounted for about 50% of the remodeling spend

d) Housing starts should increase. Rate of new home construction has been unsustainably low given continued strength in household formation. Historically housing starts run at ~1.3x HH formation to make up for housing units that are taken out of stock (natural disaster or demolition). Over the past 4 yrs. housing starts have run in-line with household formations.

Julie S. Praline

Director, Equity Analyst

Direct: 617.226.0025

Fax: 617.523.8118

Crestwood Advisors

One Liberty Square

Suite 500

Boston, MA 02109

www.crestwoodadvisors.com